The year 2025 unfolded under the sign of profound contradictions for figurative painting. Rather than following a unified trajectory, the medium was pulled simultaneously toward physical catastrophe, speculative financial euphoria, algorithmic automation, and intense ideological contestation.
The year opened with visceral material loss as the Altadena wildfires incinerated decades of studio archives, reminding us of painting’s acute physical vulnerability. Simultaneously, the Louvre announced plans to isolate the Mona Lisa in an underground bunker, illustrating how mass spectacle suffocates contemplative engagement with portraiture.

In spring, generative AI models like GPT-4o turned Studio Ghibli’s hand-crafted pastoral style into an instant viral filter, exposing how digital platforms reduce painterly grammar to statistical mimicry. Meanwhile, Christie’s staged its contested 'Augmented Intelligence' sale despite widespread artist resistance.
In summer, at IDAF'25 inside Istanbul's Atatürk Cultural Center, my interactive installation PersonA sought to invert facial recognition surveillance—fusing thousands of visitor faces into an evolving collective hybrid. Across the Atlantic, Amy Sherald's withdrawal from the Smithsonian and the subsequent federal review of museum curricula thrust portraiture directly into political warfare.
Autumn delivered majestic museum surveys: Kerry James Marshall at the Royal Academy reclaiming history painting for Black protagonists, and Gerhard Richter at the Fondation Louis Vuitton reaffirming the ethical necessity of the blur. In November, secondary markets soared to dizzying heights: Gustav Klimt’s Portrait of Elisabeth Lederer commanding $236.4 million, and Frida Kahlo’s El sueño setting an all-time female record at $54.7 million.
Amidst these colliding forces, a singular underlying question resonated throughout 2025: who ultimately controls the human countenance? The painter, the state museum, the algorithmic corporation, the speculative collector, or the individual subject? This inquiry is as ancient as portraiture itself; in 2025, it was posed with unprecedented urgency across canvas, code, and civic life.
Sources: Previous essays across this series and institutional archival records.